Both complete reports are below, exactly as published — these frames load the same files the links above open, so nothing here can drift from the reports it shows.
Scored from the owner’s forty-four answers. No documents reviewed.
Scored from the document set. Findings cite the file they came from.
Both tiers declined to publish a number for this company, and that is the whole point of the pair. The self-report was withheld because an answer cannot corroborate itself; the Validation run was withheld because 2 documents are not an evidence base either. Nothing here is broken — evidence is simply the only thing that produces a score, and there was not enough of it on either side.
Severity below is calculated from what you reported, not from what your scores were held to. A criterion answered strongly is treated as strong here even where the score was capped for want of a document — the cap is a statement about evidence, not about your business.
Validation verifies each of these against your documents, scopes the remediation to what your records actually show, and computes your valuation gap from your real EBITDA — the substantiation and the figures a self-reported assessment cannot produce. Engagement pricing comes out of a scoping conversation, once there is a document set to scope against.