Prepared by: Layer8TechGroup · Basis: Questionnaire · 0 documents · 44/44 answered · Vertical: Accounting
No overall score is published for this assessment
The assessment floor withholds a headline score when no domain rests on corroborated evidence. Every answer here is self-reported, so none does. Domain scores are shown because they are useful; a single blended number would carry a confidence this evidence cannot support. Reason recorded by the engine: no_corroborated_domain.
Domain profile
Bar length reflects the score only. Badges sit in their own column, so equal scores draw equal bars whether or not a domain carries one.
| DRDiligence Risk | 6.0 | CAPPED AT 6 | |
| OROwner Risk | 8.0 | ||
| CQCustomer Quality | 6.0 | CAPPED AT 6 | |
| OSOperational Scalability | 6.5 | CAPPED AT 6 | |
| FRFinancial Readiness | 6.0 | CAPPED AT 6 | |
| LCLegal & Regulatory Compliance | 6.0 | CAPPED AT 6 | |
| TMTechnology & Systems Maturity | 6.5 | CAPPED AT 6 | |
| HCHuman Capital | 6.0 |
What your answers say
Everything in this section is drawn from your responses, not from documents. It is what you reported, organised — not what your records substantiate. Validation is where the two are compared.
Strongest, as reported
- CQCustomer Quality 10.0/10 as reported · low exposureWhere the revenue comes from and how reliably it repeats — concentration, contract terms, retention. The distinction that matters here is between a base that renews on paper and one that renews on goodwill — only one of the two is written down anywhere.Strongest here: Top Customer Concentration, Revenue Predictability & Recurring Mix
- LCLegal & Regulatory Compliance 8.4/10 as reported · low exposureYour legal and regulatory position is a genuine strength. Business registrations are current and filed annually, with transferability already confirmed through counsel; litigation history is clean with no open or threatened claims; and employment practices are generally compliant. The main gaps—secondary agreements without change-of-control language and IP assignments never formalized—are manageable but represent areas where buyers typically focus during diligence.Strongest here: Business Licenses & Permits, Litigation & Contingent Liability
- TMTechnology & Systems Maturity 8.2/10 as reported · low exposureYour core systems—Redtail and Orion—are documented and secured under firm accounts, and you've recently tested backups and reviewed access controls, which strengthens your foundation. Data flows cleanly with minor cleanup, and you maintain a working inventory of vendors and subscriptions even if it isn't formalized yet. Some deferred upgrades exist, but you know what they are; this transparency is what keeps the score solid rather than higher.Strongest here: Core Systems Documentation & Ownership, Cybersecurity & Data Protection Posture
Thinnest, as reported
- HCHuman Capital 6.0/10 as reported · moderate exposureWhether the people stay, and whether anyone besides you can do the critical work — tenure, bench depth, how pay and benefits are structured. A team that is retained by one person's presence is held together by something that is not written down anywhere.Weakest here: Workforce Retention & Tenure, Compensation Competitiveness
- DRDiligence Risk 6.9/10 as reported · moderate exposureYour core documents exist but aren't uniformly current or complete. Financials are more than two quarters old, several figures live only in summaries rather than source records, and while you have an ownership structure documented, your operating agreement and cap table need updating. Your contracts are sampled rather than comprehensive, and employment files lack supporting detail beyond the roster itself. Strengthening this means bringing financials current and anchoring all stated figures to their source documents.Weakest here: Evidence Currency, Substantiation of Stated Figures
- FRFinancial Readiness 7.0/10 as reported · moderate exposureYour financials rest on solid accounting work—your books are reviewed by a CPA and expenses are legitimately added back—but the supporting story isn't complete. Most add-backs lack full documentation, revenue timing has been inconsistent, and growth has come unevenly with margins under pressure. Strengthening this area means closing the gap between what you can demonstrate and what your numbers claim.Weakest here: Add-Back Documentation, Revenue Recognition & Consistency
Your answers and your own notes agree throughout — nothing here needs checking against itself. That silence is worth as much as a flag: it is what makes one, elsewhere, worth reading.
Where to start
- HCHuman Capital6.0/10 as reportedStart with: Workforce Retention & Bench Depth SprintBuilds the bench and structures retention, so the people who make the business work have a reason to stay through a transition.Pulled down by Workforce Retention & Tenure, Compensation Competitiveness, Recruiting & Training Capability
- DRDiligence Risk6.9/10 as reportedStart with: Security Hardening & Data Room PreparationAssembles the diligence document set in advance, and closes the access and records gaps that turn a request list into a scramble.Pulled down by Evidence Currency, Substantiation of Stated Figures, Corporate Records Completeness
- FRFinancial Readiness7.0/10 as reportedStart with: Books Cleanup & Add-Back ScheduleCleans the books and itemises the add-backs, so your real earnings are a schedule someone can verify rather than a figure they have to take on trust.Pulled down by Add-Back Documentation, Revenue Recognition & Consistency, Three-Year Financial Trend
- OSOperational Scalability7.2/10 as reportedStart with: Process Documentation & Systems AuditWrites down how the work is actually done, so the process lives somewhere other than in the head of the person currently doing it.Pulled down by Vendor & Supplier Concentration
- OROwner Risk8.0/10 as reportedStart with: Succession Planning & Knowledge Capture SprintCaptures what you know and who else could do it, so decision authority and the relationships you hold personally stop being undocumented.Pulled down by Succession Readiness, Institutional Knowledge Capture
Readiness Guidance & Next Steps
Self-reported — not yet evidenced by documents Everything below rests on the answers above. No documents were reviewed, so none of it is verified — it is where to look first, ordered by what you told us.
DRDiligence Risk
Moderate exposureWhere to start: Security Hardening & Data Room Preparation
Assembles the diligence document set in advance, and closes the access and records gaps that turn a request list into a scramble.
OROwner Risk
Low exposureWhere to start: Succession Planning & Knowledge Capture Sprint
Captures what you know and who else could do it, so decision authority and the relationships you hold personally stop being undocumented.
CQCustomer Quality
Low exposureWhere to start: Contract Audit & CRM Implementation
Puts the customer base on paper — executed agreements with assignment terms, and a system of record so retention is something you can show rather than describe.
OSOperational Scalability
Moderate exposureWhere to start: Process Documentation & Systems Audit
Writes down how the work is actually done, so the process lives somewhere other than in the head of the person currently doing it.
FRFinancial Readiness
Moderate exposureWhere to start: Books Cleanup & Add-Back Schedule
Cleans the books and itemises the add-backs, so your real earnings are a schedule someone can verify rather than a figure they have to take on trust.
LCLegal & Regulatory Compliance
Low exposureWhere to start: Legal Compliance Audit & Contract Review
Reviews the agreements and the filings for the terms that block a transfer — change-of-control, IP assignment, employment compliance — while there is time to fix them.
TMTechnology & Systems Maturity
Low exposureWhere to start: Technology Infrastructure Audit & Modernization Plan
Moves the systems into business ownership, documents what runs where, and addresses the security and technical-debt items that surface during a technical review.
HCHuman Capital
Moderate exposureWhere to start: Workforce Retention & Bench Depth Sprint
Builds the bench and structures retention, so the people who make the business work have a reason to stay through a transition.
What Validation adds
Validation verifies each of these against your documents, scopes the remediation to what your records actually show, and computes your valuation gap from your real EBITDA — the substantiation and the figures a self-reported assessment cannot produce. Engagement pricing comes out of a scoping conversation, once there is a document set to scope against.
DRDiligence Risk — 6.0/10 · 7 criteria
Of these six things — three years of financials, tax returns, formation documents, your customer contracts, an employee roster, insurance certificates — how many could you put your hands on this week?
Four or five; one or two would need reconstructing
How old is the most recent version of your key paperwork — financials, insurance certificates, licences?
Several are stale — financials more than two quarters old
When you state your revenue, EBITDA, headcount and customer count, can you point to a document that shows each number?
Several appear only in a CIM, overview or memo
Which corporate records do you hold — formation documents, the operating or shareholder agreement, a current cap table, board or member minutes?
Ownership is documented but the operating agreement or cap table is outdated or informal
For your material customer, vendor and lease agreements, do you hold signed copies you could retrieve on request?
A representative sample rather than the full set
What employment paperwork exists — offer letters or agreements, a handbook, an org chart, work-eligibility records?
A roster exists but supporting documents are largely absent
If a buyer asked for three years of financials, contracts, and corporate records tomorrow, how long would it take you to produce them?
Days — it's already organized in one place
OROwner Risk — 8.0/10 · 4 criteria
If you decided to step back permanently, who takes over, and how far has that been prepared?
I have a view on who it would be, but nothing is written down
If a long-standing employee left tomorrow, how much of what they know is written down somewhere another person could follow?
Core things are written down; a lot still sits with individuals
If you stepped away for 60 days, what would happen?
It runs without me — someone else already makes the calls
If your most important employee resigned next month, what happens?
Someone is trained and ready to step in
CQCustomer Quality — 6.0/10 · 4 criteria
How much of your revenue comes from your largest customer?
Under 10%
How much of next year's revenue is already under contract or on recurring agreements, rather than needing to be won again?
More than 70%, on multi-year agreements
Are your customer and vendor agreements signed, current, and transferable to a new owner?
Yes — signed, current, and reviewed for change-of-control terms
Of the customers you had this time last year, how many are still with you — and how do you know?
More than 95%, tracked in a system, and the accounts grew
OSOperational Scalability — 6.5/10 · 4 criteria
How much of the day-to-day work is written down?
Some written procedures, applied unevenly
If your volume tripled over two years, what would your current systems do?
Handle it with routine upgrades; architecture is understood
Is there any single supplier, platform or subcontractor you could not replace within a month without hurting customers?
Two or three would be genuinely disruptive and costly to switch
How long after month-end do you have financials you'd act on, and who reviews them?
Within 30 days, reviewed regularly by management
FRFinancial Readiness — 6.0/10 · 4 criteria
How are your books kept?
Accrual, reviewed or audited by an outside CPA
When you calculate your real earnings for a buyer — SDE or adjusted EBITDA — what do you add back to reported profit, and could you document each one?
A meaningful amount added back; most are legitimate but only partly documented
When do you record revenue — and has that been the same in each of the last three years?
Mostly consistent, with some irregular timing
Over the last three years, what have revenue and profit done?
Grown unevenly; margins flat or slightly down
LCLegal & Regulatory Compliance — 6.0/10 · 5 criteria
Are every licence and permit you operate under current — and do you know whether they survive a change of ownership?
All current, and transferability confirmed with counsel
Have your key customer, vendor and lease agreements been read for what happens to them when the business changes hands?
Most reviewed; gaps in secondary agreements
Where do you stand on employment paperwork — work-eligibility records, written agreements, and how staff and contractors are classified?
Generally compliant with minor documentation gaps
Who legally owns your software, brand, customer data and processes — the business, or a person?
Assumed to be the entity's, but never formally assigned
What disputes, claims or potential liabilities exist that a buyer would want disclosed?
None open, none threatened, and a clean history
TMTechnology & Systems Maturity — 6.5/10 · 5 criteria
If you were unavailable, could someone else get into every system the business depends on?
Yes — all documented, all under company accounts
When did you last review who has access to your systems, and test that your backups restore?
Within the last six months — access reviewed, backups tested
If you needed to know your revenue by service line and customer for last quarter, how would you get it?
Pull it with minor cleanup
Do you have a list of every software subscription the business pays for, with who owns the account and when it renews?
We know what we use, but it isn't written down
Is anything you rely on running on software that is out of date, unsupported, or that you have been putting off replacing?
A mixed picture; some deferred upgrades, all known
HCHuman Capital — 6.0/10 · 5 criteria
Of the people working here two years ago, how many are still here — and how long has the average person been with you?
A clear majority; average tenure three to five years
How do you decide what to pay people, and when did you last compare it to what others in your industry pay?
Roughly market rate for most roles; benchmarking is occasional
The last time you hired, how much of it did you personally do — and what did the new person's first month look like?
A written process and a standard onboarding checklist
Setting yourself aside — for each key role, is there a second person who could do it?
At least one backup identified for each key role
Is anyone paid or given benefits in a way that only works while you own the business — handshake bonuses, personal arrangements, family terms?
Mostly formal and portable, with minor exceptions
Automation Maturity Index — 8.3/10 · reported separately, not blended into the assessment
When a customer calls outside business hours, what happens — voicemail, an answering service, or an automated agent that can book work?
After-hours goes to the service line, answered next business day.
Which CRM or job-management system do you use, and is every lead entered into it?
Redtail CRM with automated quarterly reporting out of Orion.
Can a prospective customer reach you or book time at 9pm on a Sunday without a person being involved?
Enquiries come through the website and are picked up next morning.
Are appointment reminders and confirmations sent automatically by text?
Review meeting reminders are automated.
Is a review request sent automatically after a completed job, or does someone remember to ask?
We ask at annual reviews.
When a quote goes unanswered, does anything follow up automatically?
Orion drives the quarterly client reporting cycle.
About this assessment
Every score above comes from an answer the owner selected, with no supporting documents submitted or reviewed. 15 of 44 criteria were held to the attestation ceiling of 6: where a criterion's top band asserts something a buyer could ask to see, an answer alone cannot carry it higher.
The remaining criteria score a judgement about capability rather than a claim about an artifact, and are not capped — capping a judgement would understate the business as surely as failing to cap an artifact claim would overstate it.
Verification prompts are raised where a self-reported answer and the owner's own description may not align. They are prompts to check against records, not findings, and not a suggestion that anything was misstated.
What this report captures is what the owner reported. A document-based validation of the same business scores the same 44 criteria against the records themselves. The difference between the two is not a formatting change: every score held at the ceiling above, every verification prompt, and the withheld headline each mark a place where the two could diverge — and a buyer's diligence is where that divergence surfaces if it is not surfaced here first. The distinction that matters is whose timetable it happens on.