Both complete reports are below, exactly as published — these frames load the same files the links above open, so nothing here can drift from the reports it shows.
Scored from the owner’s forty-four answers. No documents reviewed.
Scored from the document set. Findings cite the file they came from.
The Assessment names what to work on from what the owner reported. Validation substantiates each of those against the documents — 12 of them here — scopes the remediation to what the records actually show, and computes the valuation gap from real EBITDA. That is how 5.0/10 came to be a number worth quoting rather than an assertion.
Severity below is calculated from what you reported, not from what your scores were held to. A criterion answered strongly is treated as strong here even where the score was capped for want of a document — the cap is a statement about evidence, not about your business.
Validation verifies each of these against your documents, scopes the remediation to what your records actually show, and computes your valuation gap from your real EBITDA — the substantiation and the figures a self-reported assessment cannot produce. Engagement pricing comes out of a scoping conversation, once there is a document set to scope against.